Cases 1 - 10 of 27
ALEXANDER v. MCGINLEY
as 2:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALEXANDER v. THORNLEY et al
as 3:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CASEY THORNLEY, PATRICK NAGLE, DEANNA DELLATORRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Alexander v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 22-2880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, KATHY BISCO, JUSTIN AGOSTA and others
Alexander v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv02060
Petitioner:
Allen Keith Alexander
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. McGinley et al
as 3:2020cv02226
Defendant:
Lindsay Nye, Thomas McGinley, Justin Agosta and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Dunn et al
as 4:2020cv01542
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Jefferson Dunn, Roderick Gadson and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Anthony et al
as 3:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Reginald Keith Alexander
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, Joshua Anthony and Heather Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Alexander v. Neuschmid
as 2:2019cv01930
Respondent:
Sacramento County Superior Court and Robert Neuschmid
Petitioner:
Darryl Keith Alexander and Darryl K. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALEXANDER v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2019cv02443
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
KEITH ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alexander v. Hawkings et al
as 2:2018cv00978
Defendant:
Michael T. Wheat, Lt. Caldroun and Wayne G. Hawkings
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
