Cases 1 - 10 of 22
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21373
Plaintiff:
KEITH HAMILTON II and KEITH HAMILTON, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hamilton v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00059
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
JONES v. SERV BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv05021
Plaintiff:
ALLIE JONES
Defendant:
SERV BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., SERV CENTERS OF NEW JERSEY, INC., SERV ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
JONES v. SERV BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05021
Plaintiff:
ALLIE JONES
Defendant:
SERV BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., SERV CENTERS OF NEW JERSEY, INC., SERV ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. PLUTO CORPORATION
as 4:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KEITH HAMILTON, JR.
Defendant:
PLUTO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HAMILTON v. PLUTO CORPORATION
as 3:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KEITH HAMILTON, JR.
Defendant:
PLUTO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
San Diego Navy Broadway Comple v. DOD, et al
as 12-57234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAN DIEGO NAVY BROADWAY COMPLEX COALITION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ROBERT M. GATES, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Defense, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-10890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alejandro Garcia, et al v. Dallas County, Texa
as 12-90060
Plaintiff - Respondent:
ALEJANDRO GARCIA, JOSEPH WATTS, JAMES DECOUX and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
