Cases 11 - 20 of 8,282
Shawn Otte v. Arron Wilson, et al
as 24-1992
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otte
Defendant:
Arron Wilson, Chandra Bankhead, Michael Fusselman and others
The Masyc Group, Inc. v. Jonathan Lam et al
as 2:2024cv03900
Plaintiff:
THE MASYC GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
Jonathan Lam, Kelley Keyes, Greg Demmelmaier and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Kelley v. 3M Company Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Shannon Kelley
Defendant:
3M Company Inc, Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc and Daikin America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Massey v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03724
Plaintiff:
Carlos L Massey
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Sarah Jones, James W Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00464
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ace Kelley v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Ace Kelley
Defendant:
County of Orange, Matthew Leflore, Arthur Tiscareno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marleis Trover v. Craig Oglesby, et al
as 24-1733
Plaintiff:
MARLEIS TROVER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of DONALD D. GADDIS
Defendant:
CRAIG OGLESBY and DUSTIN KELLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
