Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Pohl v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 0:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
Maggie Pohl
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Kelly Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Darling v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2022cv13093
Plaintiff:
Melodi Darling
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company and Kelly Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Abdelhak et al v. Kelly Services, Inc.
as 2:2022cv12548
Plaintiff:
Brittney Abdelhak and Britney Parkerson
Defendant:
Kelly Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramos v. Kelly Services Inc et al
as 3:2020cv03275
Defendant:
Kelly Services Inc and Broadridge Financial Services
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Larry v. Kelly Services, Inc.
as 2:2020cv11481
Defendant:
Kelly Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aliah Larry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 b
Williams v. Kelly Services Global, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv01191
Defendant:
Kelly Services, Inc. a/k/a Kelly Connect and Kelly Services Global, LLC
Plaintiff:
Erica Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ludlum v. Kelly Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Kelly Services, Inc. and Evoqua Water Technologies LLC
Plaintiff:
James Ludlum
Yedor v. Kelly Services Inc.
as 1:2019cv05364
Defendant:
Kelly Services Inc and Kelly Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Yedor
Leamon Williams vs Kelly Services, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Kelly Services, Inc., Johnson and Johnson Consumer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leamon Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 3:2018cv07098
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, The Dow Chemical Company and Kelly Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Samuel Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
