Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Barnes v. Everett et al
as 5:2012ct03194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
William Everett, Pitt County Government, Pitt County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Pitt County Government et al
as 5:2012ct03185
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Government, North Carolina State Government, Greenville Municipal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barnes v. Pitt County Government et al
as 5:2012ct03174
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Government, Pitt County Public Defender Office, Stephan Hagen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Pitt County Municipal Government et al
as 5:2012ct03145
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Municipal Government, Elks, Major Whaley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00078
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D'Jan Barnes
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi, Hinds County, Ms., The Hinds County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43886
Plaintiff:
KENNETH F BARNES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Barnes v. USA
as 1:2011cv01285
Petitioner:
Kenneth M Barnes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Barnes v. Wilson
as 3:2010cv01474
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Barnes
Defendant:
Ronald Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35777
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Plaintiff:
KENNETH F. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
