Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sanchez v. MacDonald, et al.
as 26-4480
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SANCHEZ
Defendant:
KENNETH MACDONALD, TOWN OF ATHERTON, CITY OF SAN MATEO and others
Accredited Specialty Insurance Company v. Mississippi Underground LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00176
Plaintiff:
Accredited Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mississippi Underground LLC, Jordan Julian, Downright Entertainment LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ashton et al v. Ortez et al
as 3:2025cv02181
Plaintiff:
Lorin Ashton, Bassnectar Touring, Inc. and Amorphous Music, Inc.
Defendant:
Shawn Ortez, Kenneth Clayton Elkins, Jordan Julian and others
Pretrial Service:
Mediator Stephen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
US v. Clayton Rosenberg
as 24-4434
Defendant:
CLAYTON ROSENBERG, a/k/a Kenneth Clayton
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CLAYTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27862
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CLAYTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanchez v. City of Atherton et al
as 4:2022cv03106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Atherton, City of San Mateo, County of San Mateo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clayton v. Russell
as 4:2014cv01878
Petitioner:
Kenneth Clayton
Respondent:
Terry Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wade v. Haida et al
as 3:2013cv00769
Plaintiff:
Adrian Buford Wade
Defendant:
Phillip McLaurin, Jana Rueter, Kenneth Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Forrester et al
as 6:2011cv03308
Plaintiff:
James Lamar Willis
Defendant:
Doran Forrester, Ruch, Kenneth Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diggs v. Arnott et al
as 6:2011cv03299
Plaintiff:
Robert O Diggs
Defendant:
Jim Arnott, Tim Smith, Kenneth Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
