Cases 41 - 50 of 159
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv32186
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16128
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KENNETH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06183
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Dallas County Texas Child Support Enforcement Agency et al
as 3:2020cv01282
Defendant:
Jason C Miller, Gabrielle R George, Kayla M Massey and others
Plaintiff:
Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51355
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campbell v. Davis et al (MAG+)
as 3:2019cv00813
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Phenix City Police Department, Kenneth Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Marcel Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Davis v. Obrien et al
as 1:2019cv01032
Defendant:
R. Ruiz, A. Watt, R. Lesina and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Davis v. Obrien et al
as 2:2019cv01380
Defendant:
R. Ruiz, A. Watt, R. Lesina and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Weatherford Municipal Court et al
as 4:2019cv00502
Defendant:
Catherine Zellers, Tiffany Bagwell and Weatherford Municipal Court
Plaintiff:
Mayford Kenneth Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
