Cases 21 - 30 of 169
Kenneth Barbour v. USA, et al
as 11-5211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and United State Supreme Justices, Officially and Individual Capacities
BARBOUR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011mc00415
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATE SUPREME JUSTICES
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Barbour v. VA. State Congress Members, Senators, and House of Repersentative Members
as 2:2011cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
VA. State Congress Members, Senators, and House of Repersentative Members
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Ley et al
as 5:2011cv01301
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
John Ley, William T Moore, G R Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barbour v. Davis
as 2:2011cv00367
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Mark S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Kenneth Barbour v. Governmental Imprisonment
as 11-6777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNMENTAL IMPRISONMENT FACILITIES, GOVERNMENTAL MENTAL FACILITIES WORK COMPENSATION FOR WARDS OF THEM, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Barbour v. 12th President of the United States
as 9:2011cv01302
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
12th President of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Barbour v. William Clinton
as 11-35404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON
Barbour v. Turk
as 7:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Honorable James C. Turk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ken Edward Barbour v. United States Attorney General
as 2:2011cv03470
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
