Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Massengale v. Green, et al.
as 24-7070
Defendant:
KENNETH R. GREEN, JR., Magistrate Trustee, JUDY J. ROGERS, District Attorney and ARTURO REVELO, Public Defender
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MASSENGALE
Massengale v. Green Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kevin Massengale
Defendant:
Kenneth R. Green, Jr., Judy J. Rogers and Arturo Revelo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kevin Massengale v. Kenneth R. Green Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv02595
Plaintiff:
Kevin Massengale
Defendant:
Kenneth R. Green, Jr., Judy J. Rogers and Arturo Revelo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth R Green v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04119
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Green v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01154
Petitioner:
Kenneth Urlan Green
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Younce et al v. City of Jacksonville
as 3:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
Younce Dionne, Kenneth W Greene, Dionne Younce and others
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREEN v. ROYCE et al
as 2:2021cv16165
Petitioner:
KENNETH B. GREEN
Respondent:
RAYMOND ROYCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
