Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Montgomery (PS) v. Stincil
as 1:2025cv03138
Petitioner:
Kenneth Montgomery
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Montgomery v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv04277
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Zaccarrino v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2025cv00135
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Zaccarrino
Defendant:
Trooper Kenneth Montgomery and Colonel Gary L. Howze II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02248
Petitioner:
Kenneth Montgomery
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dickerson v. Fortenberry et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Dewitt Fortenberry, Stacy Jones, Shannon Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kenneth Montgomery
as 21-5983
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH MONTGOMERY, aka Kenneth Ladell Bell
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv79307
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roderick Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 19-6434
Defendant:
MRS. CROGAN, Assistant Health Service Administrator, MR. B. PLAVI, Bates Unit Counselor, B. VON BLANKENSEE, Former Warden FCI Morgantown and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBARA VON BLANCKENSEE, Former Warden, FCI Morgantown, TIMOTHY TOMPKINS, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Morgantown def, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
