Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Morgan v. Syngenta Crop LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00960
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morgan
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Kenneth Morgan v. S. Bermudez et al
as 2:2022cv06294
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morgan
Defendant:
S. Bermudez, V. Diaz, A. Arredondo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alcalacarrillo et al v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv00487
Plaintiff:
Oscar Fermin Alcalacarrillo, Adam Steven Anderson, Donald Lee Anderson and others
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Sue Washburn, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64040
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MORGAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2021cv03524
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Morgan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv06839
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63947
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sammie King v. Mark Chestang, et al
as 20-11440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD HINSELY, WILLIAM DOUPE, DENNIS CARL SANDER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
