Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Hughes, Michelle et al v. Gerth, Heidi et al
as 3:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marie Hughes, Kenneth Richard Hughes and K. K. H.
Defendant:
Heidi Gerth, Jennifer Witt, Katie Schickowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Kenneth Hodges, Jr.
as 14-6138
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH RICHARD HODGES, JR.
US v. Larry Speed
as 14-6494
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY KENNETH SPEED, a/k/a Kenneth Richard Godfrey, a/k/a Kenny Speed
Kenneth Richards v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-20525
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH RICHARDS
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Kenneth Richard Barber Jr. v. Santa Barbara County et al
as 2:2013cv04645
Defendant:
1 Maintenance Worker, 1 Unknown Psychiatrist, 1 Unknown Psychiatrist and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Richard Barber, Jr.
Occidental Fire & Causulaty Company of North Carolina, Inc. v. Barnhart et al
as 1:2013cv01963
Plaintiff:
Occidental Fire & Causulaty Company of North Carolina, Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory D. Barnhart, Sunset Pacific Transportation, Inc., National Specialty Insurance, Co. and others
Evans v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00221
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richard Evans
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Evans v. United States of America
as 4:2013cv00137
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richard Evans
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kenneth Richard Barber v. Janda
as 2:2013cv02011
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richard Barber, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Janda
Kenneth Richard Barber Jr v. Smalls
as 2:2012cv10430
Petitioner:
Kenneth Richard Barber, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Smalls
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
