Cases 11 - 20 of 161
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tankesly v. TN Department of Corrections et al (PSLC1)
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Calvin-Otis Tankesly, Jr.
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Lisa Helton, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Ramsey
as 2:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
T Ramsey and T. Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Jones v. Doc Holliday, et al
as 23-1094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Doc Holliday, Sheriff, Pulaski County, Lemons, Officer/Deputy, James Stricklin, Officer/Deputy and others
Defendant:
Pulaski County Jail
Williams v. Collins
as 9:2022cv01405
Petitioner:
Kenneth Williams
Respondent:
Christopher S. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Chambers
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Haisch v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01314
Petitioner:
Kenneth William Haisch
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Chandler v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Caldwell, Grier and Ms. McAfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufman v. Debottis
as 9:2022cv00652
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Kaufman and Kenneth W. Kaufman
Defendant:
Debottis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufman v. Onondaga County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Kaufman
Defendant:
Onondaga County Sheriff's Department, Syracuse Justice Center, Jamesville Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
