Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Brinson v. Murphy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00722
Plaintiff:
Alexander Brinson
Defendant:
Kevin Murphy, Officer Allen and Major Gooden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinson v. Montgomery Police Department et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00546
Plaintiff:
Alexander Brinson
Defendant:
Montgomery Police Department, Kevin Murphy and Capt. Gooden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McIntosh v. Lappin et al
as 1:2011cv01150
Plaintiff:
Richard S. McIntosh
Defendant:
Harley (I) G. Lappin, Harley G. Lappin, Joyce (I) Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Trofatter v. Patricia Caruso, et al, et al
as 10-2336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TROFATTER
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden, named as "Patricia Carusa"; MDOC Director, RICHARD RUSSELL, MDOC Bureau of Health Care Services Administrator, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as "BHCS Board Members, Jane/John Does 1a thru 1f and others
Defendant:
WALTER ORMES, Dr.; in his official and individual capacity, KEVIN MURPHY, D.D.S.; indentify on initiating document as Unknown Party #2 and DANIEL SPITTERS, P.A.; indentified on initiating document as Unknown Party #3
Ralph v. Blake et al
as 4:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D Ralph
Defendant:
Rebekah L Blake, Jackie Matheny, Tommy - Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-35175
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv01189
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2007cv00789
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, Onondaga County, Syracuse Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
