Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Simonian et al v. Manor
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Simonian and Lauren Simonian
Defendant:
Kimberly Manor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joe J. Baltas
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crook v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Crook
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Dr. Kimberly Kane, MD, Lynda Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimberly P v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Picard
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Laurence, Jr. v. Nerohna et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter F Nerohna, Wayne T. Salisbury Jr., Rachel C. Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Gino Rotondo, Sr.
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Kimberly Kane, Lori Ventituolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Parker
as 1:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Parker and Kimberly Hutnak
Defendant:
David Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diaz v. Kane et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Kimberly Kane, Christopher Cornell, Wayne Salisbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Textron Inc. v. Mackenroth
as 1:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Textron Inc.
Defendant:
Kimberly Mackenroth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
