General Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,242
James v. Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner: King Allah James
Respondent: Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center and Austin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robert Clinkenbeard v. Mark King
as 24-1370
Petitioner: Robert Joseph Dale Clinkenbeard
Respondent: Mark King and Mark King, Warden
Jones v. King
as 1:2024cv01330
Petitioner: Fredrick Jones
Respondent: M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canete v. King
as 0:2024cv00399
Petitioner: Giobel Fonseca Canete
Respondent: Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Montano v. King
as 0:2024cv00324
Petitioner: Felix Aguirre Montano
Respondent: Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
El Neter v. Penzone
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner: King Solomon Sekhemre El Neter
Respondent: Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00022
Petitioner: DARREN TARRELL KING
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Balleza v. King
as 0:2024cv00160
Petitioner: Hector Balleza
Respondent: Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ward v. King
as 0:2024cv00114
Petitioner: Joshua Lee Ward
Respondent: King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KING v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Petitioner: BRAD KING
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY, MAC MCDUFFIE and WILLIAM MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?