Cases 1 - 10 of 193
King v. Lieber Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Eugene King
Defendant:
Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wright v. Greene et al
as 5:2024ct03060
Plaintiff:
Kayie Shaune Wright
Defendant:
E. Greene, S. Fraser, Sergeant Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Vitalcare Health Strategies et al
as 0:2023cv05819
Plaintiff:
Cameron Julius Xavier Banks, Sr., Cameron Banks and CJ Banks
Defendant:
Vitalcore Health Strategies, Charleston County Sheriff Office, United States Care of USMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dudding et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv02917
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Dudding, William King and Regin Oakmen
Defendant:
SGT Thomas, LT Hare, CPT Currence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Thomas Blevins v. Danny King
as 23-6338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BLEVINS, a/k/a Tommy Ray Blevins
Defendant / Appellee:
DANNY KING, Jail Administrator and FERNIE HYMAN, Food Service Manager
McCrae v. King
as 5:2023ct03082
Plaintiff:
Samuel McCrae, III
Defendant:
Paula Lichelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Martin, Jr. v. M. King
as 23-6200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MARTIN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN M. L. KING, MS. BROWN-STROBEE, YVONNE LANE and others
Loyola v. Mana et al
as 2:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Miguel Loyola
Defendant:
Moishe Mana, Cox, Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brinkley v. Edmonds et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
Sean A. Brinkley
Defendant:
Noland Edmonds, S. King and GEO Group INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
