Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Air Vent Inc v. Powermax Electric Co Ltd Guangdong et al
as 3:2021cv00229
Defendant:
King of Fans Inc, DM (Asia) Limited and Powermax Electric Co Ltd Guangdong
Plaintiff:
Air Vent Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company v. Air Vent, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00802
Defendant:
POWERMAX ELECTRIC CO., LTD., KING OF FANS, INC., Air Vent, Inc., c/o The Corporation Trust, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landmark American Insurance Company v. Tropical Breeze Products, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv61180
Plaintiff:
Landmark American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tropical Breeze Products, Inc., King of Fans, Inc., Chien Luen Industries Co. Ltd., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHMOND v. CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO., LTD., INC. et al
as 3:2013cv01957
Plaintiff:
SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
Defendant:
CHIEN LUEN INDUSTRIES CO.,LTD., INC., (CHIEN LUEN FLORIDA), (CHIEN LUEN CHINA) and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Calliste-Ricketts v. King of Fans, Inc.
as 0:2012cv60826
Plaintiff:
Nadiar Calliste-Ricketts and Judith Daniel
Defendant:
King of Fans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rodriguez et al v. King of Fans Inc
as 4:2011cv00498
Plaintiff:
Fernando Rodriguez and Donna Rodriguez
Defendant:
King of Fans Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY v. KING OF FANS, INC.
as 2:2009cv00959
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
KING OF FANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Oak Forest Products, Inc. v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv06531
Plaintiff:
Oak Forest Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and King of Fans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Diamond H Recognition LP v. King of Fans Inc
as 4:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
Diamond H Recognition LP
Defendant:
King of Fans Inc, King of Fans Inc and King of Fans Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
