Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kirby et al v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2026cv03284
Plaintiff:
Julinda Kirby, Salisa Legg, Katalina Arellano and others
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Stanley McFadden, Kyle Ribera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Clark, et al
as 26-3196
Plaintiff:
AHMAD K. BEY
Defendant:
TYLER CLARK, CHRIS DEAN, MARIA G. BOS and others
Kirby v. Abraham et al
as 5:2026cv01737
Plaintiff:
David L. Kirby, III
Defendant:
Mamoun Abraham, John Bloodgood and Timothy Martins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirby v. Abraham et al
as 5:2026cv01736
Plaintiff:
David L. Kirby, III
Defendant:
Mamoun Abraham and John Bloodgood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIRBY v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv06968
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. KIRBY
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilderness Workshop et al v. Burgum et al
as 1:2026cv04195
Plaintiff:
Wilderness Workshop and The Wilderness Society
Defendant:
Douglas Burgum, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1701 - Violation of Federal Land Policy & Management Act (FLPMA)
Kirby v. City of Chicago
as 1:2026cv10548
Plaintiff:
Tierra Kirby
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Toulon Jr. et al
as 2:2026cv05435
Plaintiff:
Jovan Smith and Jovan Massey Smith
Defendant:
Jane Doe Mental Health Director, John Doe social worker, Errol D. Toulon Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
