Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kushman v. Rempel et al
as 5:2025cv05022
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kushman
Defendant:
Dr. Dave Rempel, Patty Peterson, Megan Meir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Clervrain et al v. Nunez et al
as 5:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Firdelyne Maisoneuve, David Cineus and others
Defendant:
Jeanette Nunez, Melinda Miguel, James Uthmeier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIDDLE v. CITY OF COLUMBUS et al
as 1:2017cv04731
Defendant:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, CLAPP, COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RIDDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks Kushman P.C. et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2017cv14052
Plaintiff:
Brooks Kushman P.C. and Brooks Kushman P.C. Insurance Plan
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
RIDDLE v. CITY OF COLUMBUS et al
as 1:2017cv03122
Defendant:
LOGAN ADAMS, CITY OF COLUMBUS, CHRIS CLAPP and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS RIDDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MERCADO v. LEINHOOP
as 1:2017cv00977
Defendant:
TONY KUMMER, BRIAN KUSHMAN and LEINHOOP
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks Kushman P.C. v. Continental Casualty Company
as 16-2411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Brooks Kushman P.C. v. Continental Casualty Company
as 2:2015cv12351
Plaintiff:
Brooks Kushman P.C.
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
L-3 Services, Incorporated v. Szekely
as 2:2011mc50293
Plaintiff:
L-3 Services, Incorporated
Defendant:
Jeffrey Szekely
Movant:
Brooks Kushman P C
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv15043
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
