Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Libby Hilsenrath v. School District of the Chathams, et al
as 23-3030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIBBY HILSENRATH, On behalf of her minor child, C.H.
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CHATHAMS, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CHATHAMS, MICHAEL LASUSA, In his official capacity as the Superintendent of the School District of Chathams and others
Eugene Jones v. Doc Holliday, et al
as 23-1094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Doc Holliday, Sheriff, Pulaski County, Lemons, Officer/Deputy, James Stricklin, Officer/Deputy and others
Defendant:
Pulaski County Jail
Libby Hilsenrath v. School District of the Chatham, et al
as 20-3474
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN CHASE, In her official capacity as the Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction at the School District of the Chathams, STEVEN MAHER, In his official capacity as the Supervisor of Social Studies for the School District of the Chathams, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CHATHAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LIBBY HILSENRATH, On behalf of her minor child, C.H.
Lee v. Holladay et al
as 4:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Mike Sylvester, Karen Chase and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Lawrence Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hilsenrath v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CHATHAMS et al
as 2:2018cv00966
Plaintiff:
LIBBY HILSENRATH
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CHATHAMS , BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CHATHAMS , MICHAEL LASUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norman v. Cooper et al
as 4:2017cv00482
Plaintiff:
Chad W Norman
Defendant:
William Cooper, Pam Johnson, Karen Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hixon v. Madsen et al
as 1:2009cv00495
Plaintiff:
Ethel Hixson
Defendant:
USA, Mary Shy, Karen Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
