Cases 1 - 10 of 55
CILLUFFO et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
MARCO CILLUFFO, JEFFREY QUARLES, PAMELA DOZE and others
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. and SUBARU CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Nguyen et al v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
as 3:2020cv07991
Plaintiff:
PHUONG T. NGUYEN, D.D.S.,INC doing business as LASER COSMETIC DENTISTRY, Phuong T. Nguyen and Phuong T. Nguyen, D.D.S., Inc. doing business as Laser Cosmetic Dentistry
Defendant:
U.S. Small Business Administration, United States of America, Maria A. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fitzgerald v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv15577
Plaintiff:
Karen Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi US Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-12204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Karen Fitzgerald v. M. Santoro, et al
as 12-1487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN FITZGERALD
Defendant - Appellee:
B. CRAM, Officer, M. SANTORO, Officer, D. ASHCROFT, Paramedic, #3045 and others
KUMAR et al v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2011cv06252
Plaintiff:
SHEKHAR KUMAR and PATRICIA J. DELANEY
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
