Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Koch et al v. Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michele Koch and Kendal Koch
Defendant:
Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education, Pleasant Hill R-III School District, Andrew Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Italiano v. Home Headquarters, Inc
as 24-480
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ITALIANO
Defendant:
HOME HEADQUARTERS, INC and GREATER SYRACUSE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Katelyn Wright, Executive Director
Akkawi et al v. Sadr et al
as 2:2024mc00058
Plaintiff:
Diana Akkawi, Yasmin Akkawi, Katelyn J. Button and others
Defendant:
Kasra Sadr, Car Law Firm, The Sadr Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Akkawi et al v. Sadr et al
as 3:2023cv02168
Plaintiff:
Diana Akkawi, Yasmin Akkawi, Katelyn J. Button and others
Defendant:
Kasra Sadr, Car Law Firm, The Sadr Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A Civil Action to Protect Against Retaliation in Fraud Cases
United States of America v. Minnick
as 2:2023mc51160
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Katelyn E. Minnick
Martin v. BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Martin
Defendant:
BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc., Vimal Mehta and Richard Steinhart
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
