Cases 41 - 50 of 95
TARANSKY v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2012cv04437
Plaintiff:
CECELIA A. TARANSKY
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Armes v. Sebelius
as 3:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jay J. Armes
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
HARRIS v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2012cv00664
Plaintiff:
REX HARRIS
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
MOFFITT v. SEBELIUS
as 2:2012cv02491
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. MOFFITT
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mansfield Memorial Homes v. Sebelius
as 1:2012cv00951
Plaintiff:
Mansfield Memorial Homes
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Mansfield Memorial Homes v. Sebelius
as 1:2012cv00948
Plaintiff:
Mansfield Memorial Homes
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Ronald Fournier, et al v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 12-15478
Plaintiff:
RONALD FOURNIER
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DELORES BERG and THOMAS DICECCO, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
Randall Wolcott v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-10010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL D. WOLCOTT, M.D., M.D.,P.A.
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States and TRAILBLAZER HEALTH ENTERPRISES LLC
Roseann Morrison v Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary
as 2:2011cv01002
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff:
Roseann Morrison, D.P.M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Barry Adler v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 2:2011cv08550
Plaintiff:
Barry Adler
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
