Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Humes v. Assanis et al
as 1:2019cv01816
Defendant:
Kathy Jennings and Dennis Assanis
Plaintiff:
Ian Frank Humes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Tolbert et al
as 1:2015cv02169
Plaintiff:
David Lavelle Thompson
Defendant:
Paris Tolbert and Kathy Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kathy Jennings v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as CAC/2:15-cv-06806
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jennings
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , DOES 1 - 100, inclusive and Does
Kathy Jennings v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv06806
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jennings
Calton v. Wright et al
as 6:2014cv00407
Plaintiff:
Allen F Calton
Defendant:
Kathy Jennings, Billy Shelton, Robert Criss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calton v. Wright
as 6:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Allen F Calton
Defendant:
Gary Wright, Jack Thompson, Stacey Belcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherry Pate et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv06321
Plaintiff:
Donna Adkins, Eva Ainesworth, Ruthie Algaier and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does
Sherry Pate et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-06321
Plaintiff:
Sherry Pate , Donna Flores , Joan Roberts and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does
Jennings et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01686
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
John Jennings and Kathy Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jennings et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01686
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
John Jennings and Kathy Jennings
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
