Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kaufman v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
John Kaufman
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, Annette Chamber Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaufman v. USA
as 1:2022cv00151
Petitioner:
Andre Kaufman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Braxton v. Meade County Detention Center, Kentucky
as 3:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Ryannel Isiah Braxton
Defendant:
Meade County Detention Center, Kentucky, J.J. Scarbrough and John Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Meade County Detention Center, Kentucky
as 1:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Ryannel Isiah Braxton
Defendant:
Meade County Detention Center, Kentucky, J.J. Scarbrough and John Kaufman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Strode et al
as 1:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Fields
Defendant:
Jackie T. Strode, Warren County Regional Jail, Southern Health Care Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Kaufman v. USA
as 15-6246
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDRE KAUFMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hamer #787762 v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2013cv00504
Plaintiff:
Shadney Hamer #787762
Defendant:
Kent, County of , Prison Health Services, Inc. , Daniel Carrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaufman v. Corizon Health, Incorporated et al
as 4:2012cv10162
Plaintiff:
Leonard Kaufman
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Inc., Anita Noronha and others
Leonard Kaufman v. Macomb Correctional Facility, et al
as 10-1161
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEONARD KAUFMAN
Defendant:
MACOMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Defendant - Appellant:
HUGH WOLFENBARGER, Warden, Warden
Leonard Kaufman v. Macomb Correctional Facility, et al
as 10-1097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEONARD KAUFMAN
Defendant:
MACOMB CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Defendant - Appellant:
HUGH WOLFENBARGER, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
