Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Gail Kay Parker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
US v. Shalonda Parker
as 16-7640
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHALONDA KAY PARKER
Parker v. USA
as 2:2016cv00208
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shalonda Kay Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Parker v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2014cv01863
Plaintiff:
Tonya Kay Parker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parker v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
as 4:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
Kay Parker
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association and Ronald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63665
Plaintiff:
ALAN PARKER and KAY PARKER
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diaz v. Bronx Census Bureau et al
as 1:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ovidian Diaz
Defendant:
Bronx Census Bureau, Louis (payroll dept.), Kay Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
PARKER v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv90192
Plaintiff:
ALAN PARKER, ALAN PARKER, KAY PARKER and others
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PARKER et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv87690
Plaintiff:
KAY PARKER, KAY PARKER, ALAN PARKER and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Parker v. Ellington et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2009cv00303
Plaintiff:
Marisa Kay Parker
Defendant:
Edward Ellington and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
