Cases 11 - 20 of 118
Devin McGuire v. Loudon County, TN, et al
as 22-6049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN D. MCGUIRE
Defendant:
LOUDON COUNTY, TN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAILER BROCKWELL, JAILER WARD, JHON KEENER, Jailer and others
Libertus v. Harris et al
as 4:2022cv01226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Libertus
Defendant:
Peyton Keener Harris, Michael Thompson, Taylor Bort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cater v. Zaid et al
as 3:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
John Cory Cater and John Cary Carter
Defendant:
Jerome Bernard Zaid, T. Keener and Wengart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plant v. Keener et al
as 4:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
Crystal Alexandria Plant
Defendant:
Jennifer Keener, Hayley Lawson, Elkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Caro v. Keener et al
as 4:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Miguel Caro
Defendant:
Jennifer Keener and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellant:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, BRIAN JOHNSON, ROBERT W. DIERKS and others
Taylor v. Siems et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Siems, Cobble, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. Keener
as 3:2022cv00263
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Goins
Respondent:
Captain Keener and Sledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas Shields v. Renee Baker, et al
as 22-15922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS E. SHIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, Warden, DWAYNE BAZE, TAMARA BRTEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
