Cases 31 - 40 of 481
Cater v. Zaid et al
as 3:2022cv01233
Plaintiff:
John Cory Cater and John Cary Carter
Defendant:
Jerome Bernard Zaid, T. Keener and Wengart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEENER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22242
Plaintiff:
JARED KEENER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Chieco, et al v. Kia Motors America, Inc., et al
as 22-55985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL CHIECO, APRIL ACHORD, JOSHUA KEENER and others
Appellant:
BLEICHMAN & KLEIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. and HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, FKA Hyundai Motor Company
Plant v. Keener et al
as 4:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
Crystal Alexandria Plant
Defendant:
Jennifer Keener, Hayley Lawson, Elkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Caro v. Keener et al
as 4:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Miguel Caro
Defendant:
Jennifer Keener and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Keener v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01061
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marie Keener
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellant:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, BRIAN JOHNSON, ROBERT W. DIERKS and others
KEENER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16211
Plaintiff:
CHANCE EVAN KEENER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Siems et al
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Taylor, IV
Defendant:
Siems, Cobble, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
