Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Brooking et al
as 1:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Keith Brooking, The Keith Brooking Revocable Trust Dated July 24, 2007, The Holly L. Brooking Revocable Trust Dated March 9, 2009 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Graeber v. Brooks et al
as 3:2011cv02294
Plaintiff:
Tammy Graeber
Defendant:
Keith Brooks and Thomas Hartford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. BBMJ, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00127
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
Defendant:
BBMJ, LLC, WILLIAM BROOKS, KEITH BROOKING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv02938
Plaintiff:
Keith Brooks
Defendant:
The City of New York, Alexander Rapp and P.O.'s John Doe #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooke v. Astrue
as 6:2011cv03152
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Keith Brooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Southern Boys Investment Group, LLC. et al
as 3:2010cv00609
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Southern Boys Investment Group, LLC., Christopher G. Mohr, Keith Brookings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2009cv02129
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Brooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brooks et al v. Armed Forces Insurance Exchange
as 2:2009cv01573
Plaintiff:
Keith Brooks and Leslie Brooks
Defendant:
Armed Forces Insurance Exchange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States v. Keith Brooks
as 08-3719
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Keith Brooks
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
