Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hicks v. State of Washington, et al.
as 25-2742
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KEITH HICKS
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ANGIE NELSON, in either her personal or professional capacity and THURSTON COUNTY FAMILY COURT
Hicks v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2024cv05607
Defendant:
Thurston County Family Court, Angie Nelson and State of Washington
Plaintiff:
Stephen Keith Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
HICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85414
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2018cv00770
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Adam Sparks Insurance Agency
Plaintiff:
Keith Hicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HICKS v. FOLINO, et al.
as 2:2013cv00855
Petitioner:
KEITH HICKS
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith Hicks et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv04219
Plaintiff:
Keith Hicks and Anita Hicks
Defendant:
DePuy Orthapedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Keith Hicks et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv08223
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Anita Hicks and Keith Hicks
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
USA v. Keith Hicks
as 09-5232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITH HICKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
