Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Ryan Slowik, et al v. Keith Lambert
as 24-5132
Plaintiff:
RYAN SLOWIK, VALERIE SLOWIK, A. S., Minor and others
Defendant:
KEITH LAMBERT
Anthony Harris v. Raven Mack
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAVEN DAWN MACK, Sergant at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in her individual and official capacities originally named as Raven Dawn Mac, KEVIN C. WHITE, Lieutenant at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in his individual and official capacities formerly known as FNU White, SANDRA J. COLLINS, Officer at Lanesboro Correctional Institution, in her individual and official capacities formerly known as FNU Collins and others
Slowik et al v. Lambert et al
as 3:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ryan Slowik and Valerie Slowik
Defendant:
Keith Lambert and Shelli Lambert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Slowik et al v. Lambert et al
as 3:2019cv00501
Defendant:
Keith Lambert and Shelli Lambert
Plaintiff:
T. S., Valerie Slowik, Ryan Slowik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellerbe v. Herring et al
as 3:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Keith Lambert, FNU Rue, Kevin Ingram and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Ellerbe
Michael Lambert v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6589
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL KEITH LAMBERT
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Lambert v. Clarke
as 1:2015cv00284
Petitioner:
Michael Keith Lambert
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lambert v. Clarke
as 2:2013cv00483
Petitioner:
Michael Keith Lambert
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lambert v. Clarke
as 3:2013cv00588
Petitioner:
Michael Keith Lambert
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lambert et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:12-cv-01244
Plaintiff:
Keith Lambert and Brenda Lambert
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
