Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Dawson v. Wheeler et al
as 1:2019cv01355
Defendant:
Porter Service Center, Sarah Brunson, Tara Lattomus and others
Plaintiff:
Neonza Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David White v. Michaelann Andrusiak, et al
as 15-3260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAELANN ANDRUSIAK, NEWTON CONDICT, IV, KEITH TAYLOR and others
Fields v. Cobb et al
as 3:2015cv00317
Defendant:
Kevin Cobb, Chad Lee, Donnie Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Scottie Dean Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. ANDRUSIAK et al
as 2:2014cv07045
Plaintiff:
DAVID WHITE
Defendant:
MICHAELANN ANDRUSIAK , NEWTON CONDICT, IV, KEITH TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Steve Lacroix, et al v. Marshall County, Mississippi, et al
as 10-60410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE E. LACROIX and KELLIE GORDON LACROIX
Defendant - Appellee:
MARSHALL COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, MARSHALL COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION and others
Taylor v. Boyden et al
as 3:2010cv03002
Plaintiff:
Elmer Keith Taylor
Defendant:
Christopher James Boyden, Unknown State Agents, Worth County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
