General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Kelley v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00323
Petitioner: Christopher Kelley
Respondent: Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelley v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00295
Petitioner: Christopher Kelly and Christopher Kelley
Respondent: Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kenneth Kelley v. William Bohrer
as 23-6179
Petitioner: KENNETH KELLEY
Respondent: WILLIAM S. BOHRER, Acting Warden and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kelley v. Sterling et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2021cv03966
Petitioner: Cameren L. Kelley
Respondent: Bryan P. Sterling, Alan Wilson and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. Bohrer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv03697
Respondent: William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner: Kenneth Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelley v. Clarke
as 1:2017cv00660
Petitioner: David Wayne Kelley
Respondent: Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. Reynolds We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00620
Petitioner: Maurice A Kelley
Respondent: Ceila Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelley v. Levister
as 5:2013hc02173
Petitioner: Frank E. Kelley, Jr.
Respondent: Gerri Levister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelley v. Bollinger
as 8:2012cv03008
Petitioner: Emmet Tyrone Kelley
Respondent: Warden Bollinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corey Johnson v. Loretta Kelley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-6588
Petitioner - Appellant: COREY E. JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee: LORETTA KELLEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?