Cases 1 - 10 of 40
USA v. Kenneth Simmons
as 22-30134
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH SHAYE SIMMONS
SIMMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05179
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DALE SIMMONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MATTHEWS et al v. GRESHAM et al
as 3:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
Derrick D Matthews and Glen E Arne
Defendant:
Justin S Fountain, Brenda L Matthews, Kenneth A Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01101
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Simmons
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03523
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH D SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv97329
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens et al v. Pacific Life Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv00130
Plaintiff:
Dianne A. Stevens, Kenneth A. Simmons and Alicia S. Elliott
Defendant:
Pacific Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aubrey et al v. The Estate of Ira Tobolowsky et al
as 3:2019cv02792
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jackie K Wheelington, Michael B Tobolowsky and others
Plaintiff:
Steven B Aubrey and Brian E Vodicka
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Simmons v. USA
as 0:2017cv01071
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Darieele Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Megonigal v. Baker's Hill, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Willard E. Megonigal, Jr.
Defendant:
Baker's Hill, LLC, Stephen J. Baker, Alan J. McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
