Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hughes v. IDOC
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robert Hughes and Kenneth Hughes
Defendant:
IDOC
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Summerford
as 3:2019cv00628
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hughes
Defendant:
Becky Summerfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. USA
as 3:2016cv00376
Petitioner:
Kenneth Hughes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Merritte et al v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv09331
Plaintiff:
Calvin Merritte, Stanley Donahue, Darryl Gullens and others
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Salvador Godinez, Michael Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gold v. Hayes et al
as 5:2013cv02720
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gold
Defendant:
Andrew Hayes, Austin Arant, Rosalyn W Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2012cv00354
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hugh Knight
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Render v. Forest Park Police Department, et al
as 11-3492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RENDER
Defendant - Appellee:
FOREST PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, KENNETH HUGHES, PHIL CANNON and others
David Render v. Forest Park Police Department, et al
as 09-3561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RENDER
Defendant - Appellee:
FOREST PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, KENNETH HUGHES, PHIL CANNON and others
Johnston v. Sizemore et al
as 5:2009cv00028
Petitioner:
Kenneth Hughes Johnston
Respondent:
Lamar W. Sizemore, Jr. and Nancy Scott Malcor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Render v. Forest Park Police Department et al
as 1:2007cv00489
Plaintiff:
David Render
Defendant:
Forest Park Police Department, Kenneth Hughes, Phil Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
