Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Kenneth James Maxwell Jr. v. Martin E. Estrada
as 2:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin E. Estrada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth James Maxwell v. Michael C. Small
as 2:2022cv09123
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Probate Judge Michael C Small
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr. v. Rob Bonta
as 2:2022cv09126
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr and Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth James Maxwell Jr. v. Michael W. Fitzgerald
as 2:2022cv01667
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nichols v. Chandler Unified School District et al
as 2:2020cv01994
Defendant:
Marcus Blassingame, Manuel A Palomarez, Kirsten Belles and others
Plaintiff:
Jaeron Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth James Maxwell v. Paul D. DeLacourt
as 2:2019cv00823
Plaintiff:
Kenneth James Maxwell, Jr
Defendant:
Paul D. DeLacourt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12835
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Unknown Party et al v. Chandler Unified School District et al
as 2:2018cv01485
Plaintiff:
Unknown Party
Defendant:
Chandler Unified School District, Hamilton High School, Kenneth James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bonnell et al v. Karels et al
as 4:2018cv03066
Plaintiff:
Kathleen T. Bonnell and Does 1 through 25
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, Devan Eisenmenger, Great Western Bancorp, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
