Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Patterson v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
as 4:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
FNU Matsui, FNU Alexander and San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv15449
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64816
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth Patterson v. Barry Davi
as 16-1653
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
BARRY DAVIS, Warden
Patterson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00199
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi , State of MS Department of Corrections, Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01312
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson and Yolanda Patterson
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., Abbott Laboratories and AbbVie Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patterson et al v. Causevic et al
as 3:2015cv00641
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson and Denise Patterson
Defendant:
Emir Causevic and Western Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv14015
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
