Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thornton v. Chemical Research Technology, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv04722
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thornton
Defendant:
Chemical Research Technology, LLC, Quad Graphics, Inc., John Doe Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Thornton v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03419
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thornton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clanton et al v. Refinery Specialties, Inc.
as 4:2016cv02423
Plaintiff:
Daniel Clanton , Eddie Hamilton , Robert Pierce and others
Defendant:
Refinery Specialties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Kenneth Thornton v. Warden, et al
as 15-11096
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH THORNTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Thornton v. Forniss et al
as 2:2014cv00498
Petitioner:
Kenneth Thornton
Respondent:
Leon Forniss and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thornton v. Forniss, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00130
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thornton
Defendant:
Leon Forniss and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. St. Mary Parish Law Enforcement Center Staff et al
as 6:2013cv00619
Plaintiff:
Manidrell Smith
Defendant:
Staff St Mary Parish Law Enforcement Center, Hellingers Nation, Hellingers Mafia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Thornton v. Cheryl Price, et al
as 11-11049
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH THORNTON
Respondent - Appellee:
CHERYL PRICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
