Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Matthews v. Dearborn et al
as 2:2016cv13763
Plaintiff:
Kevin Matthews
Defendant:
City of Dearborn and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Allister v. Rodham Clinton et al
as 1:2016cv03273
Plaintiff:
Sonja M. Allister
Defendant:
Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Kevin Matthews, et al
as 16-13823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN MATTHEWS and HUNTSVILLE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
GATSON v. MININGER et al
as 2:2015cv08895
Plaintiff:
TOKYO GATSON
Defendant:
BENJAMIN E. MININGER, JORDAN BENSEN, CARLOS MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Kevin Grissom
as 15-4583
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN MATTHEW GRISSOM
Mikell v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv02919
Plaintiff:
Joseph Mikell
Defendant:
SA Benjamin E. Mininger, SA Jordan Bensen, SA Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv02331
Plaintiff:
Tokyo Gatson
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gatson v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01233
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gatson, Jr.
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Mininger et al
as 1:2015cv01232
Plaintiff:
Belinda Allen
Defendant:
Benjamin E. Mininger, Jordan Bensen, Carlos Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
