Cases 1 - 10 of 76
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03108
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Stapleton v. Spaulding et al
as 1:2020cv01581
Defendant:
Lieutenant Shirk, Mr. Spaulding, Dr. Kevin Pigos and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01984
Defendant:
Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ramarize, Cruize and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
. Ramarize, Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Little v. Warden D. Ebbert, et al
as 19-2543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL R. LITTLE
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANCIS FASCIANA, KEVIN PIGOS, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT and others
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00803
Defendant:
John Doe Warden #3, John Doe Warden #2, Dr. Kevin Pigos and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
