Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Prince v. Headley et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Petitioner:
Kevin Prince
Respondent:
Joseph Headley and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prince v. Cole et al
as 2:2021cv00804
Plaintiff:
Kevin Prince
Defendant:
Steve Marshall and J William Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levy v. FCI Lender Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02725
Defendant:
Miles Farquhar, FCI Lender Services, Inc., Does 1 to 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Levy
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Prince v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv04711
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Kevin Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Prince v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kevin Prince
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho, LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Green et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2015cv05960
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Green , Clyde Mack , Larry Pearson and others
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prince v. Prince et al
as 6:2013cv02468
Plaintiff:
Kevin Prince, Sr
Defendant:
Lyman Prince, Jr, Louis M Ackal, Richard Louis Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Flores v. Kevin Prince, et al
as 12-10318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE RAYMOND FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN PRINCE, PA-DMS Clinic for HCV, JOHN C. KEY, M.D., Joe Ney Unit, DEBBIE IREDELL, Registered Nurse, HS Administrator Sanders Estes Unit and others
Flores v. Prince et al
as 3:2011cv02194
Plaintiff:
Joe Raymond Flores
Defendant:
Kevin Prince, John C Key, Debbie Iredell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
