Cases 61 - 70 of 3,240
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff:
ADAM STREGE
Defendant:
GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller, et al. v. ManPow, LLC
as 24-289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America ex rel. MATTHEW MILLER, DONALD K. BAKE and SAAD KHAN, relators
Defendant / Appellee:
MANPOW, LLC, a Texas limited liability corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HILDEBRANDT et al v. SIPARADIGM DIAGNOSTICS INFORMATICS et al
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
ERIC HILDEBRANDT, PAUL CHRISTIAN BURK, LAINA DUTTON and others
Defendant:
SIPARADIGM DIAGNOSTICS INFORMATICS, HEALTH LYNKS, LLC., MOHAMMED KHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Joseph et al v. Ashdan Freight Lines Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Gregory Joseph and Brandi Joseph
Defendant:
Ashdan Freight Lines Inc, Saifus S Khan and Golden Key Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sardar Ashrafkhan v. USA
as 24-1019
Petitioner:
SARDAR ASHRAFKHAN, aka Sardar Khan, (Dr. Khan)
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shakur v. Quick Grab N Go LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
KENDALL SHAKUR
Defendant:
QUICK GRAB N GO LLC and HASEEB A. KHAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
