Cases 1 - 10 of 36
HENDERSON v. SHANLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LAMOND HENDERSON
Defendant:
ASHLIE SHANLEY, NATHANIEL KNUST, VAN WORTH SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Knust-Godwin, LLC v. Ceiloh Enterprise, LLC
as 4:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Knust-Godwin, LLC
Defendant:
Ceiloh Enterprise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Ausby v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00758
Plaintiff:
Emerald Ausby
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Lavarius McFadden
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Willis, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy et al v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Steven Murphy, Emerald Ausby, Lavarius McFadden and others
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Anthony Wills, Tonya Knust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EXUM v. KNUST et al
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
TASHAWN GRANT EXUM
Defendant:
NATHANIEL KNUST and S.V. BASSETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marlon Watford v. Kellie Ellis, et al
as 20-1223
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLIE ELLIS, TONYA KNUST, LACY REAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARLON L. WATFORD
Ironworkers Local No. 808 et al v. Eidolon Analytic, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
Ironworkers 808 Pens, Kevin Barber, H. Preston Taylor and others
Defendant:
Eidolon Analytic, Inc. d/b/a Unisource Sign Connection and Eidolon Analytic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Walker v. Butler et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, A Johnson, Officer Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
