Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Acuna et al v. Pipefitters Local No. 636 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund Plan et al
as 2:2023cv10463
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ACUNA, DANIEL ARMSTRONG, DOUGLAS BARDY and others
Defendant:
PIPEFITTERS LOCAL NO. 636 SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT TRUST FUND PLAN, Carl Evans, CHRIS FREEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kopack v. Landline Trans, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Natalie Kopack
Defendant:
Landline Transportation, LLC, Tamas Rosenberger and Landline Trans LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
KOPACK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14333
Plaintiff:
SEAN GARRETT KOPACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Hamady et al
as 2:2019cv00233
Defendant:
Sgt. Hamady, Nicholas Kopack, Officer Kranz and others
Plaintiff:
Davonte Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ellington v. Lake County et al
as 2:2017cv00298
Plaintiff:
Derek Ellington
Defendant:
Lake County , B Zabrecky , Nic Kopack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sir Oscar Guillen Sr v. Haley et al
as 2:2013cv00105
Plaintiff:
Oscar Guillen, Sr
Defendant:
Haley , Fields , Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Warren Averett Companies, LLC et al v. Kopack
as 2:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Warren Averett Companies, LLC and Warren Averett Asset Management, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Kopack, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
KOPACK et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv68786
Plaintiff:
STAN G KOPACK and KAREN KOPACK
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY F/K/A UNITED STATES MINERAL WOOD COMPANY , W.R. GRACE & COMPANY - CONN. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
