Cases 41 - 50 of 63
KINSLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. THE KROGER CO.
as 5:2015cv05185
Plaintiff:
KINSLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
THE KROGER CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIB Development & Consulting Inc v. Kroger Co, The
as 2:2013cv02192
Plaintiff:
SIB Development & Consulting Inc
Defendant:
Kroger Co, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Krieger v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Joel Krieger
Defendant:
Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. , John R. Belk , John P Cato and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robert Doyle v. The Kroger Co.
as 13-5195
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DOYLE, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
THE KROGER CO.
Kroger Co v. Door Control Services Inc
as 2:2012cv00956
Plaintiff:
Kroger Co and Kroger Texas L P Southwest K M A
Defendant:
Door Control Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herdt v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Frankie L Herdt
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doyle v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2012cv00140
Plaintiff:
Robert Doyle
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Kroger Co. et al v. Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
as 3:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Limited Partnership 1
Defendant:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROTICA, INC. v. THE KROGER CO. et al
as 5:2011cv00818
Plaintiff:
PROTICA, INC.
Defendant:
THE KROGER CO. and PL MARKETING, INC.
Counter_claimant:
PL MARKETING, INC. and THE KROGER CO.
Counter_defendant:
PROTICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McClenahan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, et al
as 10-1101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY MCCLENAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York Insurance Company and KROGER CO. HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN, an ERISA welfare benefit plan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
