Cases 41 - 50 of 176
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00734
Petitioner:
Dorian Williams
Respondent:
J. E. Krueger and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Luncsford v. Krueger
as 6:2022cv03178
Petitioner:
Justin Ivan Luncsford
Respondent:
Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Krueger
as 6:2022cv03172
Petitioner:
Dorian Williams
Respondent:
J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
as 6:2022cv03162
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Moose and Jeffrey Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mahoney v. Krueger et al
as 6:2022cv03161
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Defendant:
Jeffrey Krueger, Dr. Sarrazine, Dr. Brandi Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Holden Jr. v. Krueger
as 6:2022cv03136
Petitioner:
James Holden Jr.
Respondent:
Jeff Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bell v. Krueger
as 6:2022cv03124
Petitioner:
Randy Lloyd Bell
Respondent:
Jeff Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lillie v. Unity Point Health - St Lukes et al
as 5:2022cv04024
Plaintiff:
Jean Lynn Lillie
Defendant:
Unity Point Health - St Lukes, Unity Point Health Corporation, Kevin Vermeer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Wolterman v. Hoss et al
as 5:2022cv04022
Plaintiff:
Ryan Wolterman
Defendant:
Jesse Hoss, Andy Yungbluth, Alan Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Albert Greer, Sr. v. J.E. Krueger
as 22-1754
Petitioner / Appellant:
Albert Greer, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
J. E. Krueger, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
