Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Samantha Stinson, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 26-1722
Plaintiff:
Samantha Stinson, on behalf of herself and her minor children, A.R.S. and A.W.S., Jonathan Stinson, on behalf of himself and his minor children, A.R.S. and A.W.S., Stephen Caldwell, on behalf of himself and his minor child, W.C. and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50, Bentonville School District, No. 6 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Christine Benson, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-3311
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50, Bentonville School District, No. 6 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Julee Jaeger, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-2894
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50, Bentonville School District, No. 6 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Samantha Stinson, et al v. State of Arkansas
as 25-2713
Plaintiff:
Julee Jaeger, on behalf of herself and her minor child, U.J., April Christine Berry, on behalf of herself and her minor children, C.B. and K.B., Kyle Berry, on behalf of himself and his minor children, C.B. and K.B. and others
Defendant:
Conway School District, No. 1, Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District, No. 50 and others
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas
Appellant:
Professor Stephanie H. Barclay, State of Kentucky, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Education Association, Arkansas Education Association, National Council of Jewish Women and others
Stinson et al v. Fayetteville School District No. 1 et al
as 5:2025cv05127
Plaintiff:
Samantha Stinson, Jonathan Stinson, Stephen Caldwell and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville School District No. 1, Springdale School District No. 50, Bentonville School District No. 6 and others
Amicus Curiae:
Mark David Hall
Intervenor:
State of Arkansas and Tim Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2025cv00059
Plaintiff:
Alexis Danielle Ross
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Collin County, Judge Vincent Venegoni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolan v. South Carolina Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2022cv03045
Plaintiff:
James F. Nolan
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Transportation, Christy Hall, Leland Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolan v. South Carolina Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2022cv03044
Plaintiff:
Taran Nolan
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Transportation, Christy Hall, Leland Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv55727
Plaintiff:
KYLE BERRY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berry v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv01287
Plaintiff:
Kyle Berry
Defendant:
Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. , Roche Laboratories, Inc. , F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
