Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Lance Harris v. USA, et al
as 23-3618
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANCE JERMAINE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, doing business as Jody L. King and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, doing business as Merrick B. Garland
Harris v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Lance Jermaine Harris
Defendant:
United States of America doing business as Jody L. King and U.S. Attorney General doing business as Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King v. Bobby
as 5:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Deny L. King
Respondent:
Dave Bobby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. McGraw
as 1:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
Karl L. King
Defendant:
Attorney Brian R. McGraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv00713
Petitioner:
Karl L. King
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
HEATHER L. KING and ANDREW KING
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. Harmon et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Medical Department, Warren County Regional Commonwealth and Stephen Harmon
Plaintiff:
Cornelius L. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00079
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. King, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
King v. Canton Ohio Police Department, et al.
as 5:2020cv02648
Plaintiff:
Deny L. King
Defendant:
Canton Ohio Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
