Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lucas & McKearn, LLC v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv03549
Plaintiff:
Lucas & McKearn, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Rodney S. Scott in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States of America
Fitts v. Cornelison et al
as 5:2026cv05200
Plaintiff:
Kayla Nicole Fitts and Kayla-Nicole
Defendant:
Jonathan Cornelison, Lucas Emberton, Tommy Turcol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00884
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coffman v. Akor et al
as 6:2026cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Peter Akor, S. Edwards, S. Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10059
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
AMYOT et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2026cv02806
Plaintiff:
EDWARD AMYOT, LARRY BROCK, JR., MICHAEL DAUGHTRY and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Andrew McGuire v. Ian Morris, et al
as 26-2560
Plaintiff:
Andrew McGuire
Defendant:
Quinton Lucas, in his official and individual capacities, The City of Kansas City, Missouri, Kansas City Police Department, KCPD and others
USA v. Michael Ambrose
as 26-12719
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL LUCAS AMBROSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
